Acknowledgements

The study visit in Nordhausen had been made possible with the generous financial support from German Academic Exchange Service and the University College of Cork, Department of Applied Social Studies.

My personal gratitude go to Judie Cole from the London branch of the German Academic Exchange Service - she had been always there for questions and by the unbureaucratic dealing with the matters she avoided questions in advance. As well I want to thank Fionnuala O'Connor from the Department of Applied Social Studies who - despite having to go through personally difficult times - had been there for any questions from my side, supporting the excursion.

Joe Finnerty, remaining in the background, supported the visit as well by taking much of the organisational burden on his shoulders.

Finally I want to thank "the students here and there" for bearing with the project until the end - and, I hope, developing friendships. This final note includes the Fachhochschule Nordhausen for the general support. But in particular Sabine Herrenbrueck - her work was invaluable - and the friendship which developed, the many occasions we burst out laughing will be on the personal level the final tip of salt added to this "Irish-German Stew".

 

Outline

Peter Herrmann: Travelling through History as Part of Travelling Across Borders

Impressions from Warsaw

Comparative Studies - an e-mail

Visiting the Wall of the Ghetto

Begin of the Journey

The "Leidfaden" - The Idea of the Project

Students contributions: The study visit - reports by the students

Finding Together

Looking Back - Berlin Alexander - Square


The project work:

Compiled and researched by: Maria Culleton/Noreen Gleeson/Cliona McCormack/Sharon McCormack/Ciaran McGuinness/Beth McKenna/Joanne Ryan/Nicole Scannell/Denis Spillane
 

Lone Parents: Lived experience and participation beyond the rhetoric


June 2005
 


 

 

Peter Herrmann

Travelling through History as Part of Travelling Across Borders

- Personal impressions and outline -

 


 

Impressions from Warsaw

The evening of 24th of May 2005 – I am walking along the Krakowskie Przedmieście and the Nowy Śiwat, back from the restaurant at the beautiful square of the old city of Warsaw.

The day before had been somewhat exhausting, giving the speech at the conference which had been organised by the Democratic Women’s Union of Poland. What made it arduous was not the presentation itself. As well the presence of high-ranking politicians, including Izabela Jaruga-Nowacka, the deputy prime minister, didn’t really bother me – all are boiling with water, an experience I made during the years being in touch with «this kind of people». Well, the topic – policies with regard to homeless women and children in Ireland – had been OK and the only thing that made all this a little bit exhausting was the total lack of information. Even on my arrival I have not been provided with proper information. I just had to face the hundred plus people, had to look at the agenda which still looked very much like a draft agenda – and the only relief I have had were the interpreters. The deputy didn’t keep the time which had been scheduled for her speech at all. The debate took longer than had been planned – and I nearly saw my speech turning into a toast at a leisurely «after dinner session» at midnight. Anyway, at the end everything went well. I still gave my full speech and from wherever they took the time – the conference took only slightly longer than planned. This gave me at least the opportunity to go with the federal representative for equal opportunities of the PDS for a coffee – finally there are some common links between her and myself. And it is always worthwhile to manifest such «hidden contacts», such «kinship in mind».

 


 

This day, the 24th had been a kind of respite for me, an opportunity to look around in the city that played such an important role in history. Indeed for me a memorable stay. Travelling quite a lot, such a remark may well mean something. Warsaw is simply a city which I liked – rising after it had been nearly completely razed to the ground by the fascists after the uprising in 1944 (http://www.warsawuprising.com/). – Well, this says at least as well something about socialism and its «lack of productivity» – an unproductive effort if we only consider living standard in GDP and goods to be bought.

Remarkable are at first glance an amazing arsenal of green and the restoration of the old part of the city – a really lovely job. Remarkable is as well the hideousness of the large apartment buildings, however leaving large free spaces in between – at least up to now. Once it had been similar in Berlin around the Alex – but there much of this spaciousness is lost, filled up with department stores, office towers and others. One has to fear the same happening in Warsaw. Probably one of the costs of joining the «European Union’s wealth» – and its race of the rat.

Remarkable as well how fast one forgets the larger framework. Walking through the streets of Warsaw, the achievements of the reconstruction work after the war is quickly forgotten – objections to the rotten buildings which can be found here as in so many other cities get the overhand. Though such poverty stricken quarters can be found as well for instance in Hamburg and Munich – they belong to the group of the richest cities within the EU – here they have another «meaning». One – and I am not really an exception – thinks instantaneously something like «well, socialism …». As said, I am not really an exception. But at least I am still not fall entirely into this trap. I was getting aware of this as well the evening before – when I talked with Monika. I can still remember that there had been «other times» as well «for us in the West» [– well, these are the words of the «red grandfather» ;-)]. Whenever we go slowly through a process of change we do not really mention it – we only get aware of the changes when we lean back and make a walk through our own, personal history. But when coming to places of which we do not know the history, everything seems to stand still – there is no beginning, and presence simply seems to be a magic standstill. Comparison, however, requires more factual reflection, and as well more emotion and empathy. Empathy as well as regards the own, personal history. And in this sense the open areas I mentioned are much more than simply matters of physical space. I remember knowing similar spaces from Paris and Athens – so different places; but what all these cities have in common is that all three plaid historically important roles and that these spaces are very much open spaces – open in the sense of being «owned» by the citizens, places where people live. – An interesting array for social research: the connection between history and the people’s gathering.


Comparative Studies - an e-mail

All this is not least about the standards we use in comparative social research – a mail which I recently wrote to a colleague comes to my mind and I might quote it here:

Dear Paul, life in Riga treated me well so far. After our work ended I spent the first day quite a lot with Susanne, Wim and Olavi which had been fine in its own terms. I am frequently meeting Susanne in Brussels; we worked over the last years on some issues and do so increasingly. And being there in Belgium we hardly find the time to just talk about life or let alone just to live.

Being here and having some time to reflect on the world (despite writing a piece for a book which is long overdue, preparing my presentation for next week in Warsaw ...) our recent talk came back to me - you remember our thoughts when I joined you going to the bus station. Of course, 100 LAT remaining as spending money – after «paying the bills» - is damned little money. However, walking through the town, going out as well to the outer areas I think it is problematic just to take any amount of money as standard. Some more things which have to be considered are simply of objective nature. For instance the ticket for a bus for a week or even a month (the ticket many people just showed when the controller came along) costs just 3.60. In Germany for instance – your current homeland – you will pay this money probably just for one trip. Another point I simply do not know is the health and social insurance. I frequently think about this in comparison IRL-FRG. In Ireland we pay for every single visit to the doctor - 40 Euro each time; if I am not mistaken in Germany you have to pay 10 Euro per quarter and that is it even if s/he refers you to a specialist. If an Irish doctor refers you to a specialist you have to pay the specialist another 80 Euro ....This is even if you are privately insured with the VHS or another crowd. However, the amount of money we pay for insurance is marginal; the Germans pay a huge amount. This does not mean that the Irish system is at the end better or even as good as the German one. As such it doesn't tell us anything about the price either. But at least it shows that comparisons are extremely difficult. But this is only the smallest part of difficulties. What came to my mind moving through Riga had been something more. Did you see the amount of flowers? And did you see how many people actually bought them? Did you see the extent of public spaces and public life? Did you see ... - well unlikely that you did: Today, Tuesday, I had been sitting in an ice cream parlour in the old town. Opposite I saw an elderly lady who had been begging - for this she moved like a stiff dancing bear. I thought this looked as if it would be without any dignity. Still, the lady asked somebody to take a photo of her - from wherever she got a camera for her own. Did you see in the open spaces the amount of monuments - large ones, reminding of large battles and victories and some large and small, inconspicuous stones, mentioning the name of artists - in many cases names of which most of us never heard about.

It doesn't mean that we should not compare. Nor does it mean that we just can ignore some «standard signs» of poverty. However, it definitely means that we have to be careful. Thinking about all this reminded me as well at reading the classical literature - I read a bulk of literature in particular from France, England and not least Russia. «Old stuff», however telling so much about the «peoples' soul». I am quite a lot in France and even today I meet many figures I know from Balzac’s La Comédie Humaine. And there are so many figures in the UK I know from Dickens. I never read Latvian literature - but some reminded me indeed at figures from Turgenjew, Dostoyevsky and not least Lev Tolstoy, who provided the name to my house - the Jasnaja Poljana. And there will be a good reason that Tchaikovsky had such a great resonance when we went the one evening with our small international group to the opera - I think many who had been there would not go to the opera in Germany if they would have a «comparable» income.

There is another dimension to all of this: The «standard setting» which takes place through «us», in this case the EU. I am not sure how exactly to deal with this - as to some major extent I believe that this process of European integration is basically a good thing. But the question is indeed what we make out of it. How can we in actual fact promote a process of «integration» that goes ahead without accepting the underlying «imperialising approach». This is not only a question of the dominance of a (very specific) economic thinking. Beyond this it is very much a question of the validity of a culture which goes back to the humanist values of an «enlightened enlightenment». - At least I had been frightened to see two categories of houses and house prices looking into the windows of the auctioneer’s: One in LAT - the cheaper ones; and one in EURO - the houses for those who may deserve a later place in a new museum of occupation.

Such reflections, encountering such a reality make the entire social research so difficult - and so exciting. And any further rational explication I would have and you will have, does not take a single lot from this excitement - an excitement which may add to the LATS one gets for social research.

Best wishes,

                         Peter

 


Visiting the Wall of the Ghetto

For me personally this wider framework – and in particular its historical dimension – is getting tremendously clear when I stood in Warsaw between 55, Sienna Street and 62, Złota Street. I enter the backyard – an inconspicuous backyard between apartment buildings and first I cannot really make out the relict of the ghetto wall (see for general information: http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/Holocaust/warsawtoc.html; http://www.ushmm.org/wlc/article.php?lang=en&ModuleId=10005069), the wall which had been three meter high, enclosing the quarter in which the Jews lived – or probably it would be fairer to say: struggled to survive.

First they came for the communists, and I did not speak out—

because I was not a communist;

Then they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out—

because I was not a socialist;

Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out—

because I was not a trade unionist;

Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out—

because I was not a Jew;

Then they came for me—

and there was no one left to speak out.[2]

Martin Niemoeller[3]

See for more info: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_Niem%F6ller

I could not avoid shivering; I could not avoid remembering the film «The Pianist» by RomanPolanski. I could not – and did not want – to think of the many unknown, no: well known, but unnamed people who lived – and died – there. The open and hidden resistance here in the ghetto, during the Warsaw uprising and in so many other places. So many lives had been lost there – literally and as well indirectly. People staying alive but being broken for the rest of it. It is probably as well this for me eternal knowledge which makes the visit to Warsaw so special – the history of resistance which is seemingly forgotten when walking through one of the parks, the suppression of the Jews and the others that seems to be hidden behind the green of the leaves of the trees in spring and the outcry of indignation and hope after 1945 which seems to be drowned in the melodies of the singing birds. It makes it so special when one sees the walk, the green of the leaves and the singing of the birds just as continuation of the hopes and as demand to go on with working on true mutual understanding.

picture of the still existing small part of the Wall of the Ghetto

 


 

Walking back this evening along the beautiful, vivid Nowy Śwat I remembered not least the recent visit to Nordhausen, the study visit with the students from the Higher Diploma Course in Social Policy. – Didn’t they complain about something similar as I did in the beginning – the difficulties of being asked to work in an entirely different way as being used to? One could say they had been «prepared», they knew what was to come; however, they felt as well thrown into the cold water, being forced to swim – and in a way they had been right with their feeling.

(from: http://www.chopinsocietyofhouston.org/photos.aspx?id_event=-10&id_photo=62)


Begin of the Journey

Saturday, the 23rd of April – it is still quite early when I enter the office. Despite being my usual time of taking up work the special reason today is that I have to meet the students at 8.30 a.m., joining them for the trip to Farranfore from where we fly into the airport Hahn. From there the trip will continue to Nordhausen in Thuringia. Before meeting the small group I have to do some work in the office as I just returned the day before from France. One could say the life of a member of the «travelling community» – not feeling boundaries, living in various places and feeling everywhere at home. Still, there is the one place which is called office where I went that morning to do some work before leaving.

It is all a little bit hectic. Later, sitting in the bus, looking at the Irish countryside, gives me a kind of relieve.

(from: www.atpm.com/10.11/ ireland/index.shtml)

I think everything is well prepared – and if I forgot something I cannot change it anyway. It is a fine day and the Irish landscape shows its beauty. A day one thinks about settling and just staying where it is nice, relaxing on «my mountain» near Cork, looking across the Jasnaja Poljana and reflecting on the pressure and leisure stemming from the globalised life we are all caught in.

Well, for the students of the course it is perhaps not hectic but they feel at least under pressure. It is just a short time to go and they have to sit their exams. As much as it is true that the aim of any course is not the final marks but the general process of learning, as much is true that the exams are the focus and finally the point which decides to a large extent about the future position in life. The learning in Nordhausen's College

(from: http://www.fh-nordhausen.de/portrait/img/campus/kolleg.jpg)

is different, only loosely connected with the student’s immediate concerns.

The "Leidfaden" - The Idea of the Project

In a way the project developed by accident. Every year the College in Nordhausen organises an International Project Week (http://www.fh-nordhausen.de/internationales/f_ipw.html). Lecturers from different countries meet there for one week, teaching the local students in Germany their subjects – be it engineering, public relations, culture, management or social and economic issues. I had been already invited for a couple of times as guest lecture. In 2004, I took up a brochure – a presentation of the "Leidfaden".

The project was a Leid-Faden – a «suffering line» and as such it marked meaningful points in the history of the town.

One has to know that very close to Nordhausen the Concentration Camp Dora Mittelbau is located –  the place where during the German fascist regime Wernher von Braun build the V2, the weapon with which the German terrorists wanted to win the war, gaining the power to suppress the world.

questions from a worker who reads

who built thebes of the seven gates?

in the books you will find the names of kings.

did the kinds haul up the lumps of rock?

and babylon, many times demolished

who raised it up so many times? in what houses

of gold-glittering lima did the builders live?

where, the evening that the wall of china was finished

did the masons go? great rome

 

is full of triumphal arches. who erected them? over whom

did the caesars triumph? had byzantium, much praised in song

only palaces for its inhabitants? even in fabled atlantis

the night the ocean engulfed it

the drowning still bawled for their slaves.

 

the young alexander conquered india.

was he alone?

caesar beat the gauls.

 

did he not have even a cook with him?

philips of spain wept when his armada

went down. was he the only one to weep?

frederick the second won the seven years' war. who

else won it?

 

every page a victory.

who cooked the feast for the victors?

every ten years a great man.

who paid the bill?

 

so many reports.

so many questions.

bb

 

http://www.geocities.com/Area51/1256/POEMS1.HTM#workerreads

Actually, von Braun did of course not build this rocket himself. Workers did it, workers who had been deported and forced to build the weapon – their personal alternative was to loose their life. Or should one say to loose their life immediately? Many of them died after a short time due to the harsh working and living conditions. Although Dora Mittelbau had not been an extermination camp, the SS disparaged life of those who worked in the vaults of the mine. Even walking nowadays through the tunnel for half an hour makes us feeling uncomfortable.

Now, back to the «Leidfaden». The project I mentioned was as well about providing a «Leitfaden» – it is spelled slightly differently but pronounced the same as the «Leidfaden». The meaning now is a «guiding line». And the project aimed on providing a guide which showed that there are places where help, support can be obtained.

Hearing about the recent Hartz-reforms in the German social legislation, I thought it could be a good idea to work on a similar project – looking at single parents who are affected by the changes in the legal system and providing them with some guidance through the jungle of legislation and provisions that are in place to help them. Probably a too ambitious idea for a course over such a short time span and aiming at such a work in a comparative perspective. Still, I thought it is worthwhile to start. And so did Sabine[4] whom I knew from the first stay in Nordhausen. When I met herby chance during one of my other journeys I talked to her about the idea and spontaneously she wanted to join – and so we could make the step from words to action.

I presented the idea at the beginning of the year to the students – and they agreed to join. The same was the case with the students in Nordhausen who had been in Sabine’s course. The students worked to some extent by using the Internet as means of communication – and of course many phone calls had been made, mostly between the lecturers, talking amongst themselves about the work of «their» students, including the information on the teaching in Germany and Ireland respectively. But the real highlights had been seen in the study visits.

In January the German students came to Ireland

and late April we went from Ireland to Nordhausen. In a way this had been part of the International Project Week; however, the setting had been a different one. The special group work had been demanding – teaching and group work in the morning, trying to accept the want for independent work and nevertheless being there for sufficient guidance. The afternoons mostly packed with visits of different social agencies.

The HDip-student’s reports

Sharon McCormack: Higher Diploma in Social Policy Class 2004/2005 and International Project Week in Nordhausen – An Overview of our Work with the German Students
April 2005

Cliona McCormack: An Education on the GDR

Noreen Gleeson: The Montessori- Kindergarden in Nordhausen

Maria Culleton: Nordhausen Hospital

Joanne Ryan: Visit to the "One-World-Shop"

 

Translation was one task I accepted to do, asking some additional questions which seemed to be interesting to me, taking the knowledge I already have had was another task. And of course some simple administrative tasks which had to be worked on in the background kept me kind of busy.

But actually it had been much more – a process of permanent learning and «self-awareness training». Being «member of the travelling community» – as I termed it in the beginning – lets me easily forget how many boundaries actually exist. For those who are frequently moving around, these boundaries seem to be non-existent; for those who travel on their leisure these boundaries are something more or less meaningless – reflecting the excitement of «exotic experiences». It is for those who only travel occasionally for the purpose of work that these boundaries really come to the fore. Under such conditions so many tiny things are getting relevant which do not exist for the «commuters» – or which may just be hidden for them.

Finding together

Though I studied briefly as well in the then GDR[5] – I had been grown up and mainly lived in the West of Germany which I left some ten years ago. And coming «back» there for work now, I feel frequently a little bit alienated. Naturally the colleagues I am working with are usually much younger as time went on for me; many of the colleagues especially in the «New Laender» represent the younger generation. This means as well that they have different experiences – and consequently I come back into a «foreign country», indeed. As well, the experiences with the then GDR are different. Coming there, I mention how much the experience of the reality actually depends on the «perception of the other», as well the hopes and expectations we connect with «the other». And so some conflicts during our debates which had been part of the study visit remain pertinent – controlled; perhaps they are so well controlled by factual arguments that these actual clashes remain unnoticeable for many of those who are present.

What is most decisive in this context is that the students have to work with similar questions. There is, however, one significant difference. I experienced «the other» again and again – and again and again I have to re-learn. The students, be it the Irish students or those from Germany – come into a situation which is not so much shaped by experiences. It is twisted around expectations which cannot be clearly defined – prejudices, things that are known from school, from reading, from hearing people talking about their experiences with the «Prussian spirit». And of course to some extent as well by a quick generalisation of ad-hoc experiences. At the end it is only a marginal difference between their learning and my learning.

Language, of course matters – though many German people speak some English and the German students actually did quite well, it is always a little challenge to communicate in a situation where the participants have different «native» languages. However, what really matters is the difference in points to connect with. But as with language it is the same with experience. The paradox which occurs is that we overestimate differences if we ignore, deny them. So, despite the different languages we usually find a fast way out of difficulties arising from this – we talk slowly, we use simple terms and phrases and so on. If one wants to use the trendy term «intercultural learning» one can say that this depends on recognising and accepting the self – and as Georg Simmel pointed out in his little piece on The Stranger, it is this especially the case in confrontation with the unfamiliar.

And so it is especially around the working experiences that the unfamiliar gets the overhand. Cooperation goes through phases where the common interest in the Leidfaden is more in need of an own Leitfaden than being able to pertain developing a Leitfaden for others. – A philosophically winded expression of something very simple: As long as the common experience, the common interest is not strongly present it is difficult to overcome the differences in the way we approach things.

I get an impression of this when we went the one afternoon to visit Dora Mittelbau – for me these visits are always a tribute to many personal friends who went through the hell of concentration camps, who hardly survived and to whom I have had close relationships when I lived in Bielefeld. It is as well a kind of obligation to make others familiar with what happened. And I got the impression that this kind of sharing one of the probably least believable experiences welded us to some extent together, brought us all closer together – at the end. It is a kind of filter, making clear where commonalities can be found and where a clear distinction can be made out between what matters and what is only a superficial issues in cursorily moods.

So it may well be that the end was a kind of beginning. This experience – and as well the many nice things we did together – may be a foundation for future understanding of each other. And it had been as well an experience which is basis of friendship.

**********************

For me it is always a little bit funny when I am in the canteen of the European Parliament. It seems to be such a variety of public, a rich mixture of people from all countries and so many ways of life. - And there is one stand that catches again and again my attention: the fridge with the mineral water. I never counted the different brands. But most of the countries have water from their own country there – I never looked if they do, but at least the people there can really choose. They can choose «their own water» to have at least some stability – finally water is the most important foundation of life. - It seems to be only a triviality ...


 

Looking Back - Berlin Alexander - Square

After the students left Nordhausen I had to leave as well, however, not joining them home but going on to Berlin, where I had to give a lecture at the Alice-Salomon Fachhochschule.

Being in the German capital, I take the opportunity to meet a colleague from the ministry for family affairs – he wanted to talk to me about a concern we have in common: our disapproval of the EUropean service directive, the so-called «Bolkestein directive».

His office is located at the Alexanderplatz – a spot which still has something of the buzz which Alfred Doeblin caught so well in his novel Berlin Alexanderplatz. After leaving the building I walk across the Alex. Instead of the ramming noise by the tram which is described by Doeblin, I hear from some distance a well known song – I cannot stop myself humming the melody, beginning to sing the text. The music is played by a crowd mobilising for a new Monday-demonstration – a demonstration against the Hartz IV-legislation.

 

1. Una mattina mi sono alzato,

O bella ciao, bella ciao,

Bella ciao, ciao, ciao,

Una mattina mi sono alzato,

E ho trovato l'invasor.

2. O partigiano portami via,

O bella ciao, bella ciao,

Bella ciao, ciao, ciao,

O partigiano portami via,

Qui mi sento di moror.

3. E so io muoio da partigiano,

O bella ciao, bella ciao,

Bella ciao, ciao, ciao,

E so io muoio da partigiano,

Tu mi devi seppellir.

4. E seppellire sulla montagna

O bella ciao, bella ciao,

Bella ciao, ciao, ciao,

E seppellire sulla montagna

Sott l'ombra di un bel fior.

5. Casi le genti che passeranno

O bella ciao, bella ciao,

Bella ciao, ciao, ciao,

Casi le genti che passeranno

Mi diranno «che bel fior».

6. E questo è il fiore del partigiano

O bella ciao, bella ciao,

Bella ciao, ciao, ciao,

E questo è il fiore del partigiano

Morto per la liberta.

(Source: http://ingeb.org/songs/bellacia.html - 15.3.2002)

The song gives me confidence – despite the sometimes very different approaches, the even contradicting points of departure and as well the different goals there is a good long stretch we can go together. And we have to go together instead of leaving it to others. We have to learn to overcome some part of the daily ignorance in which we all are caught in one or the other way to avoid that others make use of it. Learning to walk together will allow us to stop those who want to walk against us.

This evening, instead of joining the Monday demonstrations I pass the Humboldt University, located «Unter den Linden». After briefly hesitating, I enter the main building. It is with a certain pride as it had been here that I gave my first public presentation – several years ago. I walk up the stairs – the song which I am still humming mixes with the words which are chiselled into the stone of the wall:

Philosophers have hitherto only interpreted the world in various ways; the point is to change it.

Karl Marx: Theses On Feuerbach – the 11th theses; written 1845


 
 

[2]          "Als sie die ersten Kommunisten holten, habe ich geschwiegen;                
denn ich war kein Kommunist!            
Als sie die ersten Juden holten, habe ich geschwiegen,             
denn ich war kein Jude!      
Als sie die ersten Katholiken holten,    
habe ich geschwiegen,        
denn ich war kein Katholik!                  
Als sie mich holten, war niemand mehr da, der seine Stimme hätte erheben können!!

[3]          A personal remark: I do not remember exactly when I met Martin – we had been both active in the German peace movement in the early/mid 1970s. He is one of the personalities who lived his knowledge, experience, hopes and visions. He is one of the excellent examples of those individuals who went through the unbelievable bitterness of the times and learned, not to answer with the same means. Understanding, solidarity, help and something what can be seen as «targeted aggressiveness» had been combined in living together with others.

[4]          Sabine Herrenbrueck, Diploma in Social Pedagogies, Lecturer at the Fachhochschule Nordhausen

[5]          The studies there had not been the main studies; the focus of my student life had been Bielefeld (sociology) and Hamburg (economics).